As for those who say such a shield would be too expensive-just how much is Earth and humanity worth?įrank Sterle Jr. The naysayers of such a universal defence shield should suggest other plausible ways through which to avoid nuclear-exchange devastation anywhere, let alone everywhere. The system would monitor the planet’s air space and launch anti-missile defensive measures, equipped with latest computer-systems-hacking fail-safe technology. For example, they could expand their nuclear arsenal while collaborating with their own friendly nations (however few) to achieve the means to overwhelm the biased anti-missile shield.Ī good means of avoiding such dreary anti-productive measures-thus-counter-measures would be to ensure all interested ‘sides’ that the anti-missile defence shield would be independently programmed to intercept all airborne projectiles regardless of their origin. That kind of act could motivate some nations-most worrisome being rogue nations such as the bizarre-behaviour North Korea via their Great Leader-to find other means to compensate for their new great disadvantage. has thus far developed its shield technology in actual hardware would only serve to intercept ballistic missiles targeting nations that are U.S. Unfortunately, whatever small degree to which the U.S. Had the system been shy of competent, let alone a failure, there’s no reason to believe that the nuclear-armed nation of Israel was bluffing when it promised to retaliate against Iraq if the Patriots failed to deliver and Israeli casualties were incurred. Only one scud made it through the defence shield intact and another after being severely damaged, though both did not result in death, injury nor even notable damage. If I recall correctly, the Patriot missiles had been barely developed with no practical testing, thus they had to be field tested during actual warfare. One need only note the success of the Patriot batteries stationed around Israel during Desert Storm. In fact, over two decades ago the tech had impressively (at least to me) proved itself to be on solid ground, though I feel that it could’ve already been by now solidly established as a fully functional defense shield. Star Wars, the anti-missile defence shield, into which Canada currently seems to be placing some serious stock, is quite realistic and technologically sound. Thermal radiation radius (3rd degree burns): 8.Unlike Ronald Reagan's 1980s Strategic defence initiative, a.k.a. Two Birmingham Labour MPs defy leader Jeremy Corbyn over TridentĪir blast radius (20 psi): 2.17 km (14.8 km²)Īir blast radius (5 psi): 5.35 km (90 km²).The strongest air blasts would stretch out by a further half a kilometer in every direction, reaching areas such as Hockley and Small Heath.Īreas such as Erdington, Kings Heath, Selly Oak, Handsworth and parts of Smethwick would be badly damaged, with a huge number of fatalities and injuries. The situation would be different if the bomb exploded at a height to cause optimum destruction. The blast would create a 600m wide crater (grey), and 1.5km wide fireball (orange) an air blast stretching 5.4km out (grey) and those within a 9km radius would be highly likely to receive third degree burns (peach). Thermal radiation radius (3rd degree burns): 8.95 km (251 km²) It would leave many with third degree burns, causing severe scarring or disablement and may require amputations.Īir blast radius (20 psi): 1.67 km (8.8 km²) Those in Aston, Small Heath, Moseley and Hockley would be subjected to blasts still capable of destroying most residential buildings - causing huge numbers of fatalities and injuries.Īnyone avoiding those areas but still within 9km of the epicentre would be subjected to huge levels of thermal radiation. Corbyn attacked over 'barmy' plans to scrap Trident.Without medical treatment, between 50% and 90% of those caught in the areas would be killed from acute effects alone - dying takes between several hours and several weeks. Those not killed instantly in areas such as Ladywood and Edgbaston would most likely face a painful death. People in Bordesley Green and Sparkbrook at the time would face almost certain death as a powerful air blast smashes buildings to smithereens. (Image: NUKEMAP)įatal levels of radiation would increase greatly if the nuke exploded at ground level. A nuclear blast at ground level would create a 600m crater (grey), a 1.5km fireball (orange), deadly levels of radiation (green) for 2.3km in all directions and thermal damage capable of causing third degree burns 9km away.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |